Thursday, July 23, 2026

My Current Options Portfolio: Performance, Winners, Losers, and Key Risks

 

My Current Options Portfolio: Performance, Winners, Losers, and Key Risks

I recently reviewed my options portfolio to better understand where my returns are coming from, which positions are creating the most risk, and whether my portfolio remains aligned with my longer-term investment strategy.

At the time of this review, I had 21 open option positions representing 33 contracts, along with one closed trade. Most of my positions are long-dated call options, although I also hold one long put, several cash-secured puts, and one covered call.

Portfolio Overview

The total capital invested in my open long-option positions was approximately $62,175. The current market value of those positions was approximately $57,683, resulting in an unrealized loss of about $4,492.

However, I had also generated approximately $660 in option premium from cash-secured puts and a covered call. After accounting for that premium income, my estimated net open-position loss was approximately:

$3,832, or about 6.2% of the capital invested in my long-option positions.

While the portfolio is currently negative, the losses are not evenly distributed. A large portion of the decline is concentrated in one position.


My Options Strategy Mix

My open portfolio includes:

  • 16 long-call positions

  • 1 long-put position

  • 3 cash-secured puts

  • 1 covered call

Most of my long calls expire in 2028. This gives the underlying companies additional time to grow and allows my investment thesis more time to develop.

The long-dated expiration dates also reduce some of the short-term time-decay pressure associated with shorter-term options. However, long-dated options can still lose substantial value if the stock price declines, volatility falls, or the original investment thesis does not materialize.

My Best-Performing Positions

Several positions were profitable at the time of the review.

KLAC January 2028 $220 Call

My KLA Corporation call was my largest winner in dollar terms.

  • Initial cost: $8,000

  • Current market value: $8,700

  • Unrealized gain: $700

  • Return: 8.75%

KLAC remains one of my higher-conviction semiconductor positions. The company benefits from increasing semiconductor manufacturing complexity and the growing need for advanced process-control and inspection equipment.

ETHA June 2028 $16 Calls

My ETHA calls produced my strongest percentage return among the open positions.

  • Initial cost: $1,000

  • Current market value: $1,290

  • Unrealized gain: $290

  • Return: 29%

This position gives me exposure to Ethereum through an exchange-traded product rather than directly holding the cryptocurrency.

CRCL December 2028 $85 Call

One of my CRCL calls was also profitable.

  • Initial cost: $3,200

  • Current market value: $3,400

  • Unrealized gain: $200

  • Return: 6.25%

I hold two CRCL call positions with different strike prices. Although the $85 strike was profitable, the $80 strike was still showing a loss. This demonstrates how entry price, option premium, implied volatility, and timing can produce different results even when the underlying company is the same.

SLV December 2028 $55 Calls

My SLV calls were up approximately 6%.

  • Initial cost: $2,810

  • Current market value: $2,980

  • Unrealized gain: $170

  • Return: 6.05%

This position provides exposure to silver prices and may also benefit from growing industrial demand from solar energy, electronics, electrification, and other technologies.

COPX January 2028 $85 Call

My copper-mining ETF position was also profitable.

  • Initial cost: $1,700

  • Current market value: $1,860

  • Unrealized gain: $160

  • Return: 9.41%

Copper remains an important material for electric vehicles, renewable-energy systems, transmission infrastructure, data centers, and grid modernization.

My Largest Losing Positions

Although several positions were performing well, a few losses were having a significant effect on the overall portfolio.

GOOGL December 2028 $450 Calls

My Alphabet calls were my largest losing position.

  • Initial cost: $12,850

  • Current market value: $9,410

  • Unrealized loss: $3,440

  • Return: negative 26.77%

This one position represented approximately 90% of the net open-position loss after including the premium income from my short-option trades.

That is an important risk-management lesson. Even when a portfolio contains many positions, one large position can dominate the total result.

The GOOGL calls are far out of the money, with a $450 strike price. Although the expiration date is still more than two years away, the stock would need to appreciate substantially for the position to become profitable by expiration.

GME January 2027 $23 Calls

My GameStop calls had the largest percentage loss.

  • Initial cost: $1,760

  • Current market value: $975

  • Unrealized loss: $785

  • Return: negative 44.6%

This is one of the more speculative positions in the portfolio. Compared with my semiconductor, technology, metals, and infrastructure-related investments, the GME position depends more heavily on market sentiment, volatility, and the company’s ability to successfully transform its business.

ORCL December 2028 Calls

I hold two Oracle call positions.

The $135 strike call showed:

  • Initial cost: $5,000

  • Current market value: $4,743

  • Unrealized loss: $257

  • Return: negative 5.14%

The $130 strike call showed:

  • Initial cost: $5,300

  • Current market value: $4,858

  • Unrealized loss: $442

  • Return: negative 8.34%

Together, the two ORCL positions represented more than $10,000 of invested capital. Because both contracts depend on the same underlying stock, I view them as one combined exposure rather than two completely separate investments.

MSFT January 2028 $260 Put

My Microsoft put was also losing value.

  • Initial cost: $1,600

  • Current market value: $1,320

  • Unrealized loss: $280

  • Return: negative 17.5%

This position differs from most of the portfolio because it is bearish. Microsoft would need to decline substantially for the put to gain significant intrinsic value.

Because the rest of my portfolio is generally bullish on technology, the MSFT put provides some downside exposure. However, the hedge is imperfect because the strike price is far below Microsoft’s current market price.

Premium Income From Short Options

In addition to buying long calls and puts, I used cash-secured puts and a covered call to generate premium income.

The premium gains shown in the portfolio were:

  • DUOL $111 cash-secured put: $100

  • DUOL $135 covered call: $240

  • SPCX $110 cash-secured put: $190

  • ORCL $113 cash-secured put: $130

The total premium income was approximately:

$660

These contracts expired on July 31, 2026, making them the most time-sensitive positions in the portfolio.

Cash-secured puts can generate income, but they also create an obligation to purchase shares if the stock closes below the strike price at expiration. Covered calls generate income but may require me to sell my shares if the stock rises above the strike price.

For this reason, short-option positions require closer monitoring as expiration approaches.

My Closed LDOS Trade

I also closed one LDOS call trade.

  • Initial cost: $590

  • Sale value: $800

  • Realized gain: $210

  • Return: 35.59%

This was a successful trade and produced the highest realized percentage return in the portfolio review.

The result also highlights the importance of taking profits when an option has appreciated significantly. Long options can lose value quickly if the underlying stock reverses direction or implied volatility decreases.

Portfolio Concentration

My five largest long-option exposures were concentrated in:

  • GOOGL

  • ORCL

  • KLAC

  • COIN

  • CRCL

Together, these positions represented approximately 72% of the capital invested in my long options.

This means that although I own several different contracts, the portfolio is not as diversified as the number of positions might suggest.

I also have meaningful exposure to several correlated investment themes.

Technology and Semiconductors

This group includes:

  • GOOGL

  • KLAC

  • ORCL

  • MSFT

These positions may be affected by artificial-intelligence spending, cloud growth, semiconductor capital expenditures, interest rates, and technology-sector valuations.

Cryptocurrency and Digital Assets

This group includes:

  • ETHA

  • IBIT

  • COIN

  • CRCL

These positions may move together during periods of strong or weak cryptocurrency-market sentiment.

Metals and Mining

This group includes:

  • SLV

  • COPX

These investments are influenced by commodity prices, global economic growth, industrial demand, renewable-energy investment, and supply constraints.

Key Lessons From the Portfolio

The most important lesson from this review is that portfolio risk is driven by position size, not simply by the number of holdings.

I own many different option contracts, but the large GOOGL position has had a disproportionate effect on my total return.

The second lesson is that correlated investments should be evaluated together. ETHA, IBIT, COIN, and CRCL are different securities, but all are influenced by the broader digital-asset market. Similarly, several of my technology positions may decline together if market valuations compress.

The third lesson is that long-dated options still require active risk management. A 2028 expiration date provides more time, but it does not guarantee recovery. The underlying company must still grow enough for the stock price to overcome the strike price, the premium paid, and the effects of time decay.

Final Thoughts

My options portfolio was down approximately $3,832 after accounting for premium income, but the loss was heavily concentrated in the GOOGL position.

Several positions—including KLAC, ETHA, COPX, SLV, CRCL, and COIN—were profitable or close to breakeven. My closed LDOS trade also generated a strong realized return.

Going forward, my main priorities are to monitor position concentration, evaluate whether each investment thesis remains valid, manage assignment risk on short options, and avoid allowing a single position to dominate the performance of the entire portfolio.

Options can provide leverage, income, and exposure to long-term investment themes. However, they also require disciplined position sizing, careful expiration selection, and continuous review of both the underlying company and the option contract itself.

Disclaimer: This article documents my personal portfolio and investment experience. It is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or option contract. Options involve substantial risk and may not be appropriate for every investor.

Sunday, July 19, 2026

New High-Conviction Alert — Strong Buy Candidate

KLA (NASDAQ: KLAC) is one of my favorite long-term semiconductor equipment companies. If I had to choose one semiconductor equipment company for long-term investment, I would rank them approximately as:

  1. ASML
  2. KLA
  3. Applied Materials
  4. Lam Research

KLA isn't as famous as NVIDIA or ASML, but it has one of the strongest competitive positions in the semiconductor industry.

Investment Thesis:

I consider this stock as high conviction because of:

  • Extremely wide moat
  • Dominant market share
  • High switching costs
  • AI-driven semiconductor demand
  • Excellent profitability
  • Outstanding free cash flow
  • Shareholder-friendly capital allocation
  • Very high return on capital
What Does KLA Actually Do?

KLA makes equipment that:

  • inspects chips
  • detects defects
  • measures nanoscale features
  • controls semiconductor manufacturing quality

Think of it this way:

  • ASML prints the chip.
  • Applied Materials deposits materials.
  • Lam Research etches materials.

KLA makes sure the chip is actually manufactured correctly.

Without KLA, many advanced chips would fail yield targets.

Main Competitive Moats:

1. Technology Leadership 

This is KLA's biggest moat.

Chip manufacturers are moving toward:

  • 3 nm
  • 2 nm
  • 1.4 nm

At those geometries, defects measured in just a few atoms can render a chip unusable.

KLA's inspection tools are among the industry's best at detecting those defects.

2. High Switching Costs

Once a fabrication plant is qualified with KLA tools:

  • engineers are trained on them,
  • software workflows are built around them,
  • process recipes are optimized for them.

Replacing KLA equipment would require extensive requalification, creating a strong incentive for customers to stay.

3. Very Few Competitors 

In inspection and metrology, KLA is one of the dominant players globally.

Competition is limited because developing equivalent systems requires years of optical, computational, and process expertise.

4. Long-Term Customer Relationships 

Major customers include:

  • TSMC
  • Samsung
  • Intel
  • Micron
  • SK Hynix

These relationships have been built over decades.

5. AI Tailwind 

AI accelerators require:

  • tighter process control,
  • higher yields,
  • more inspection steps.

As chip complexity rises, inspection intensity generally increases, which benefits KLA.

Risks

No investment is without risk. The primary risks for KLA are:

  • Cyclical semiconductor capital spending.
  • Reduced investment by major foundries.
  • Export restrictions affecting sales to China.
  • AI infrastructure spending slowing more than expected.
  • A global recession delaying fab expansions.

However, because KLA generates a significant portion of its revenue from installed-base services and process control needs that persist across cycles, it tends to be more resilient than some equipment peers.

My Long-Term View

Bull Case

If AI demand continues and advanced-node manufacturing expands, KLA could benefit from:

  • More inspection steps per wafer.
  • Continued pricing power.
  • Strong free cash flow.
  • Ongoing share repurchases.
  • Double-digit EPS compounding over multiple years.

Bear Case

If semiconductor capital spending contracts sharply, KLA's earnings can decline for a period because it remains exposed to the equipment cycle.


Sunday, January 4, 2026

Dividend Growth in the first week of 2026

 Happy New Year, dividend investors! As we step into 2026, the dividend growth train is already rolling. Last week, just three companies announced dividend increases, but what a quality trio they are: Alamo Group Inc. ($ALG), Bank OZK ($OZK), and EMCOR Group Inc. ($EME).These announcements highlight companies with strong fundamentals, conservative payout ratios, and impressive long-term dividend growth track records. Let's break them down.


1. Alamo Group Inc. ($ALG) – 13.3% IncreaseAlamo Group, a leader in vegetation management and infrastructure maintenance equipment, boosted its quarterly dividend by 13.3% to $0.34 per share (from $0.30).

Growth Streak: Continues a consistent history of annual increases.

Key Stats (approximate as of early January 2026):Current Price: ~$170–$186

Annual Dividend (new): ~$1.36

Yield: ~0.8–0.9%

Payout Ratio: Very safe at ~14%

FCF Payout: Comfortably low

5-Year Dividend CAGR: ~18%

This raise reflects confidence in the company's resilient business model and disciplined capital allocation.

2. Bank OZK ($OZK) – 2.2% IncreaseBank OZK, known for its rock-solid dividend reliability, raised its quarterly payout by 2.2% to $0.46 per share.

Impressive Streak: This marks the 62nd consecutive quarterly increase – truly elite territory.

Key Stats:Current Price: ~$46

Annual Dividend (new): ~$1.84

Yield: ~4.0%

Payout Ratio: ~29%

FCF Payout: Excellent coverage

5-Year Dividend CAGR: ~10%

Bank OZK's unwavering commitment to growing dividends quarter after quarter makes it a cornerstone for income-focused portfolios.

3. EMCOR Group Inc. ($EME) – Massive 60% IncreaseEMCOR Group, a powerhouse in electrical and mechanical construction services, delivered a blockbuster 60% hike, lifting its quarterly dividend to $0.40 per share (from $0.25).

Key Stats:Current Price: ~$638

Annual Dividend (new): $1.60

Yield: ~0.25%

Payout Ratio: Extremely low at ~6–9%

FCF Payout: ~4%

5-Year Dividend CAGR: ~26%

While the yield remains modest due to strong share price appreciation, this aggressive increase signals tremendous free cash flow generation and plenty of room for future growth.


Thursday, December 25, 2025

Summary of the Dividend Kings and their dividend raise in 2025

 Hey everyone! If you’re looking for the ultimate "set it and forget it" addition to your portfolio, you’ve come to the right place. Today, we are looking at the Dividend Kings—the elite group of companies that have managed to increase their dividends for at least 50 consecutive years.

Think about that for a second: 50 years covers the high inflation of the 70s, the dot-com bubble, the 2008 financial crisis, and a global pandemic. These companies didn't just survive; they gave their shareholders a raise every single year.

I’ve summarized 2025 Dividend Kings list, and there are some fascinating trends regarding yield, safety, and growth that you need to see.

If your primary goal is maximum cash flow right now, two names stand out from the crowd:

  • Altria Group Inc (MO): Currently leading the pack with a massive 7.05% dividend yield.

  • Universal Corp (UVV): A close second with a 6.14% yield and a solid 55-year growth streak.

While these yields are tempting, always look at the Dividend Payout Ratio. Altria’s sits at 79.39%, which is high but common for their industry.

Yield isn't everything. If you have a longer time horizon, you want Dividend Growth. This is where the 5-Year Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) comes in. Some of these "old" companies are growing their payouts like tech stocks:

  • Nordson Corp (NDSN): Boasting a staggering 16.02% 5-year CAGR.

  • Parker-Hannifin Corp (PH): Not far behind with 15.36% growth.

  • Lowe's Companies Inc (LOW): Proving that retail still has teeth with 14.84% growth.

Investing in a company like Nordson means that even if the starting yield is lower (1.31%), your "yield on cost" could explode over the next decade.

A dividend is only as good as the cash backing it up. We use the FCF Payout Ratio to see if a company is paying dividends out of real cash or just accounting earnings.

  • The "Safety" Stars: Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) has a very comfortable 20.82% FCF payout ratio, meaning their dividend is incredibly safe. Cincinnati Financial (CINF) is even lower at 19.45%.

  • The "Caution" Zone: Hormel Foods (HRL) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) currently have payout ratios over 100%. This often indicates the company is paying out more than it's bringing in, which is something we need to monitor closely for sustainability.

Finally, let's pay some respect to the companies with the longest-running streaks on the board. These are the "Kings of Kings":

  • American States Water Co (AWR): 71 years of increases.

  • Northwest Natural Holding Co (NWN): 70 years.

  • Dover Corp (DOV): 70 years.


Saturday, December 20, 2025

Weekly Income Report: Selling cash secured put and covered call

 

Hello everyone! As we approach the end of the year, I’m sticking to my core strategy: generating consistent weekly income through Covered Calls and Cash Secured Puts. By leveraging the volatility in the market, I was able to collect a total of $484.00 in premiums this past week alone.

With a total portfolio value of approximately $82,700, this week’s activity resulted in a 0.59% weekly return, which scales to an impressive 30.43% annualized yield.


The Week’s Top Performer: NIKE ($NKE)

The standout trade this week was $NKE. I sold a single Cash Secured Put with a $61.00 strike price and walked away with $60.00 in premium. Not only was this my highest single-contract earner, but it also netted a strong 0.98% weekly return on that specific position.

My strategy remains diversified across tech, retail, and crypto-adjacent ETFs. Here is a snapshot of how the week played out:

  • Heavy TQQQ Activity: I utilized several TQQQ Puts to take advantage of price fluctuations, with returns ranging from 0.50% to 1.17% per position.

  • High Yielders: Some of my most aggressive returns came from EOSE (1.42% weekly) and HIMS (1.00% weekly).

  • The Mix: I balanced my risk by selling 11 Puts (bullish/neutral bias) and 8 Calls (neutral/bearish bias), ensuring I was collecting premium regardless of which way the individual tickers moved.

                                                    
MetricWeekly Result
Total Premium Collected$484.00
Total Capital Utilized$82,700.00
Weekly Portfolio Return0.59%
Projected Yearly Return30.43%
Out of the Money (OTM)

        18 out of 19 of my positions ended - Out of the Money.

    For my Calls (like $SOFI, $ETHA, $ETHU): The stock price ended or is currently below my strike. This is great because I keep 100% of the premium and get to keep my shares to sell calls against them again next week.

    For my Puts (like $TQQQ, $UBER, $NFLX): The stock price is safely above my strike. These are already or on track to expire worthless, letting me pocket the premium without having to use my cash to buy the shares.         

In the Money (ITM):

     I have one position that is In the Money and I got assigned it on Friday:

$NKE (NIKE) Put – Strike $61.00: With the current price at $58.71, this put was ITM by $2.29.

My Game Plan for $NKE: I’m perfectly happy being assigned here! By taking the $60 premium I collected, my "effective" cost basis for the stock drops to **$60.40**. I’ll immediately pivot to the "Wheel Strategy" and start selling Covered Calls against them to continue generating income. 

   Having 95% of my positions OTM is a fantastic result for a weekly cycle. It shows that my strike price selection is providing a solid "margin of safety" while still allowing me to capture significant yield.           

    


My 2025 Options Income Growth:

I started this journey of selling Cash Secured Puts (CSP) and Covered Calls (CC) back in June 2025, and seeing the progress visualized in this chart is a powerful reminder of what consistency can do.

When I first began in June, my income was just a small "proof of concept" starting at less than $100.00. Since then, I’ve navigated different market cycles to scale this into a significant monthly revenue stream.

The chart highlights a clear growth trajectory as I refined my strategy and likely increased my capital allocation:

After a quiet start, July saw a jump to roughly $700.00, followed by another solid increase in August to approximately $1,600.00.
Things really heated up in the fall. September income climbed to about $2,300.00, and October marked my best month ever, breaking the $3,000.00 barrier because of 5 friday's in a month. Also in September and October I sold options on risky stocks like $ETHU, $MSTR, $BMNR, etc.

Income moderated toward the end of the year, with November bringing in roughly $2,000.00 and December (so far) sitting at approximately $1,200.00. After getting assigned multiple $BMNR and $ETHU, I learned my lessons. Now I am not chasing the yields. I am selling options on good quality stocks which are not so overpriced.
  

Friday, November 7, 2025

Weekly option trading update: I earned $891 by selling options

 This week I earned $891 by selling cash secured puts and covered calls on 7 different stocks. I earned this money from $66,050 which is 71% yearly return. I got assigned one call and one put options. My covered call on $SBUX was assigned at $82. I earned $1,185 in total by selling options on $SBUX plus my average cost of $SBUX was $81.5 per share. So I received another $150 gain by selling 3 contracts of the stock. So in one month I received $1,335 while keeping my invested money of $81.5x300 =$24,500. 

After the earnings $DUOL Duolingo fell more than 20%. I sold a cash secured put at $220 strike price for $300. I got assigned but I am hopeful the stock will bounce back. I will keep doing the whiling strategy on $DUOL. 

My other options were called away. So I took the premiums. I earned $125 from $75 $ETHU (ethereum 2x), $NVO $53 covered call for $100.

The following is the full list:



Monday, November 3, 2025

My weekly options activity for this week

 Today I sold weekly covered call and cash secured put, which will expire this Friday. The full list is the following:


Today I collected $530 premium by selling the weekly options. Last week, I was assigned to $NVO and $BMNR. I will look to sell $BMNR tomorrow as it was down today. I am hoping for a comeback.

Today, I collected $300 by selling 3 covered calls with a strike price of $82. If it is assigned, I will sell them. I also sold covered call of $NVO for $100 per contract with a strike price of $53. Last week I was assigned at $51.

I also collected $125 premium by selling cash secured put on $ETHU 2x $ETH. The strike price was $75. 

So I got $530 from $39,400 which is 1.35% weekly return and yearly it is 69.95%.